Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic with registered number ISSN 2548-1843 (Print) and ISSN 2621-8704 (Online), is a peer-reviewed journal published two times a year (January and July) by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan RS Husada Jakarta. Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic is intended to be the journal for publishing articles reporting the results of research on Health Science field especially Nursing, Midwifery, Medicine Science, Pharmacy, Nutritionist, Environment Health, as well as with their development through interdiciplinary and multidiciplinary approach. The submission process of manuscript is open throughout the year. All submitted manuscripts will go through the blind peer review and editorial review before being granted with acceptance for publication. Initially published in 2018, Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic has been using Open Journal System requiring all writers to register in advance before they are allowed to upload the manuscript they write online. Afterwards, the editors, peer reviewers, and writers can monitor the manuscript processing.
INDEXING AND ABSTRACTING
Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic indexed by:
- Google Scholar
- Perpusnas: Indonesia One Search (IOS)
- PKP | Index
- Portal Garuda: Garba Rujukan Digital Ristekdikti
FOCUS AND SCOPE
Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic is a journal developed to disseminate and discuss the scientific literature and other research on the development of health especially nursing, medicine, midwifery, nutritionist, etc. This journal is intended as a medium for communication among stake holders on health research such as researchers, educators, students, practitioners of Health Office, Department of Health, Public Health Service center, as well as the general public who have an interest in the matter. This journal contains a script on Health Sciences that includes:
- Dental health
- Environmental Health
- Health analyst
- Labor Health
- Public health
- Health Administration
- Public Health
PEDOMAN PENULISAN NASKAH
- Redaksi menerima naskah dari peneliti dan pemerhati di bidang IPTekS kesehatan terutama keperawatan.
- Naskah dikirim (submit) melalui website ejournal.stikesrshusada.ac.id. Proses editing, review, copy editing dan produksi dilakukan secara daring (online). Author harus melakukan register sebelum melakukan submission.
- Naskah diketik menggunakan Microsoft Word. Ditulis spasi 1,5, font size 12, huruf Times New Roman, maksimal 20 halaman ukuran A4 (kuarto). Gambar/ grafik dicetak dengan printer Laser Jet, atau dibuat dengan Harvard Graphic
- Template Artikel dapat dilihat di: Template Artikel
Sistematika artikel Hasil Penelitian terdiri dari: Judul, Nama dan Instansi Penulis, Abstrak, Pendahuluan, Metode, Hasil, Pembahasan, Kesimpulan, Ucapan Terima Kasih (bila ada) dan Daftar Pustaka. Sementara artikel yang berupa Kajian Kepustakaan atau Ulasan Ilmiah lain, sistematikanya terdiri dari: Judul, Nama dan Instansi Penulis, Ringkasan (Summary), Pendahuluan, Bab Bagian yang Diulas, Kesimpulan dan Daftar Pustaka.
Ditulis dalam bahasa Indonesia, singkat dan jelas.
Nama dan Instansi Penulis
Ditulis tanpa gelar akademik, instansi ditulis di bawah nama dengan cara diberi superskrip 1), 2), 3), dan seterusnya.
Abstract dan Summary
Ditulis dalam bahasa Indonesia dan Inggris, lebih kurang 200 kata, berisi tentang highlight hasil penelitian yang menonjol dan terkait dengan judul artikel. Kajian kepustakaan/ ulasan ilmiah lain mengikuti.
Berisi latar belakang dan rumusan masalah, sitasi kepustakaan, tujuan dan manfaat, kontribusi hasil.
Berisi tentang waktu dan tempat penelitian, jenis dan teknis pengambilan data, hipotesis (bila ada), tehnik analisis dan interpretasi data.
Hasil mengacu pada tujuan penelitian, berisi tabel/ gambar/ grafik dan narasi. Judul tabel/ gambar/ grafik dan narasi diawali huruf besar pada setiap huruf depan kata
Berisi perbandingan hasil penelitian dengan tinjauan kepustakaan yang terkait
Kesimpulan (dan Saran)
Penarikan kesimpulan didasari hasil yang diperoleh, dengan mengacu kepada judul penelitian. Dapat dikemukakan saran terkait.
Ucapan Terima Kasih (bila ada)
Dapat dituliskan nama perseorangan atau instansi yang banyak membantu dalam pelaksanaan penelitian.
Disusun berdasarkan abjad nama akhir penulis utama. Judul karangan buku ditulis huruf brsar pada setiap awal kata yang bukan kata sambung, sedangkan untuk jurnal hanya pada awal kata saja.
Contoh bila kepustakaan diambil dari jurnal ilmiah:
Russo M, Martinelli M, Sciorio E, Botta C, Miele E, Vallone G, S. A. (2013). Stool consistency, but not frequency, correlates with total gastrointestinal transit time in children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 163(6), 1188–1192.
Contoh bila kepustakaan diambil dari buku:
Lewis, S.L., Dirksen, S.R., Heitkemper, M.M., Bucher, L., Camera, I.M. (2011). Medical surgical nursing : Assesment and management of clinical problems. St. Louis, Missouri : Mosby, Inc.
Contoh bila diambil dari internet:
Poedjanarto (2006). Waktu kinerja produktif PNS, groups.yahoo.com/group/Appreciative, diperoleh tanggal 29 April 2017.
SCREENING FOR PLAGIARISM POLICY
Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic has a policy of screening for plagiarism. We use Crossref Similarity Check Powered By Ithenticate to checking the authenticity article and tracking duplicate content. Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic will immediately reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
Before submitting articles to reviewers, those are first checked for similarity/plagiarism tool, by a member of the editorial team. The papers submitted to Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic must have similarity level less than 23%.
Plagiarism is the exposing of another person’s thoughts or words as though they were your own, without permission, credit, or acknowledgment, or because of failing to cite the sources properly. Plagiarism can take diverse forms, from literal copying to paraphrasing the work of another. In order to properly judge whether an author has plagiarized, we emphasize the following possible situations:
- An author can literally copy another author’s work- by copying word by word, in whole or in part, without permission, acknowledge or citing the original source. This practice can be identified through comparing the original source and the manuscript/work who is suspected of plagiarism.
- Substantial copying implies for an author to reproduce a substantial part of another author, without permission, acknowledge or citation. The substantial term can be understood both in terms of quality as quantity, being often used in the context of Intellectual property. Quality refers to the relative value of the copied text in proportion to the work as a whole.
- Paraphrasing involves taking ideas, words or phrases from a source and crafting them into new sentences within the writing. This practice becomes unethical when the author does not properly cite or does not acknowledge the original work/author. This form of plagiarism is the more difficult form to be identified.
The journal is published by the Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan RS Husada Jakarta twice a year, January and July.
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.https://www.lockss.org/
OPEN ACCESS POLICY
This journal is an open access journal which provides immediate, worldwide, barrier-free access to the full text of all published articles without charge readers or their institutions for access. Readers have right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all articles in Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
- Ressa Andriyani Utami
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Manuscripts that have been submitted will be reviewed by the editor. The editor will decide whether the manuscript is appropriate to the scope and focus and appropriate for the reviewer. This initial activity usually takes a week.
PUBLICATION ETHIC: RETRACTION
Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic is a peer-reviewed electronic journal. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (Akademi Keperawatan RS Husada Jakarta). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of a peer-reviewed article in of Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan RS Husada Jakarta, as the publisher of Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Akademi Keperawatan RS Husada Jakarta and Editorial Team will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.
The editor of the Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
This journal charges the following author fees.
Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
Authors are NOT required to pay an Article Submission Fee
Article processing charges (APCs) / Article Publication Fee: 300000.00 (IDR)
If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Fee to cover publications costs, Â the Journal management and publication in general. The authors or the author's institution is requested to pay a publication fee for each article accepted. The fee covers:
- DOI registration for each paper.
- Checking the article similarity by iThenticate; the final result will be sent to authors (by request).
- The cost of printing articles and shipping to the author (for authors from Indonesia)
A waiver or partial waiver of author fees may be decided by the editor in case of lack of funding, excessive length of submitted manuscript or other reasonable reasons provided by the author during the submission. The author should clearly declare that he asks for a waiver in the comments to the Editor box during their submission. A waiver is most likely to be denied if it is not asked in this stage. The waiver will have no effect to the review result.
The papers published in the Jurnal Kesehatan Holistic will be consider to retract in the publication if :
- They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
- the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
- it constitutes plagiarism
- it reports unethical research
The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf